Metrics
Revolution
CMO Magazine, September 2004 By Elaine M. Cummings
It's time for marketing to stand up and be counted. Literally.
As one Chinese
proverb reminds
us: The person
who says it
cannot be done
should not interrupt
the person doing
it.
Nostalgic for the '90s? Don't be. Sure, everything seemed so simple back then.
As long as the
stock was high
and the market
cap was growing,
everyone was happy.
The only metric
that mattered was
shareholder value.
You
knew it couldn't
last, but you played
along, thankful
for a deep pool
of marketing resources
and a wink and
a nod around ROI.
But when the bubble
burst and the economy
tanked, an old
word crept back
into the lexicon:
accountability.
Certainly,
you already had
plenty of metrics
in place, particularly
those of you at
larger organizations
well schooled in
tracking sales
leads, market share
and CPM. But these
pockets of performance
measures don't
provide the big
picture senior
managers are now
seeking. What you
lacked was a way
to measure—and
communicate—the
overall effectiveness
of your marketing
organization.
So,
as bottom lines
were scrutinized
and budgets slashed,
marketing became
an easy target
because it was
the least accountable.
With a long history
of relying on traditional
marketing metrics—those
that were easily
measured but not
necessarily the
most important
to the business—marketing
was slow to respond
to the ROI challenge.
Until now.
"I've
always felt that
marketing drove
profitable revenues," says Karen Haefling, CMO at Cleveland-based KeyCorp, the parent company of financial
services firm KeyBank. "But now there's a new accountability in marketing that hasn't been there in the
past. Companies
are beginning to
realize that it's
important for their
marketing strategies
be aligned with
their business
strategies."
Haefling
is one of the CMOs
who gets it. She
understands the
need to guide her
staff through the
difficult changes
required to bring
more discipline
to every facet
of marketing. "We know that measuring the effect marketing has on a company's bottom line is
not something that
can be achieved
simply by popping
in the software
du jour," says Haefling.
What
she and others
also know is that
there's an urgency
to get it done—and
done right—in order
to gain competitive
advantage and improve
company performance. "I feel the pressures to deliver financial results like everybody else," says Colin Sabol, general manager of marketing at GE Infrastructure in Trevose,
Pa. "The good news is that marketing is no longer seen as a support function. We're
now in the game.
We're part of the
daily rhythm of
the operations
of the business."
Welcome,
then, to the new
world of marketing
metrics, one that
requires a more
strategic perspective
of marketing effectiveness,
presented in ways
that the CEO and
CFO can understand.
The road ahead
offers both promise
and peril for marketing
leaders, with ROI
as the primary
driver. Doing it
right means that
CMOs will be better
positioned to request
additional funds
for new initiatives
and to fend off
attempts to slash
what were previously
perceived as discretionary
expenses.
Unfortunately,
the main problem
with marketing
ROI is that there
is no consensus
about what the
term actually means.
Everyone agrees
ROI has a place;
no one can agree
about where that
place is.
A
recent survey by
the Association
of National Advertisers
(ANA) and Forrester
Research highlighted
the challenge in
striking terms:
78 percent of the
respondents said
measuring the sales
impact of marketing
was difficult,
and most couldn't
even agree on the
definition of ROI
(see "Defining Moments," right). "Measurement continues to be the hardest task in managing marketing campaigns," says Jim Nail, principal analyst at Forrester.
"ROI
techniques can
help assess how
other critical
marketing metrics
that capture customer
perceptions and
behaviors lead
to a change in
long-term customer
value," says James Lenskold, president of the Lenskold Group and author of Marketing
ROI: The Path to
Campaign, Customer,
and Corporate Profitability. "Without the ROI measure, decisions such as improving customer relationships and
loyalty cannot
effectively guide
marketing investments
and maximize profits."
In
addition to ROI,
metrics should
include key performance
indicators that
are predictive
of future performance
and brand health,
and insight about
why strategies
are or are not
working. "But ROI is the ultimate measure for guiding marketing investments, because every
marketing decision
affects a company's
ability to generate
profitable sales," says Lenskold.
Unfortunately,
many companies
still don't have
a clear picture
of their overall
marketing performance, "which may be why they cannot assess it," says Tim Ambler, a senior fellow at the London Business School and author of
Marketing and the
Bottom Line. "They prefer to fumble around in the dark. But they may not like what they see
when the lights
go on."
Many
CMOs struggle with
how to successfully
make the transition
to measurement
programs without
disrupting campaigns
and strategies
that seem to be
working effectively.
Many of these programs
lack the supporting
expertise in finance
and analytics required
to capture more
of their potential
value. "Money is being left on the table," says Lenskold, "and that's profit that could be going directly to the bottom line."
The
key to developing
a better focus
around marketing
ROI efforts, most
practitioners and
experts agree,
is to begin with
the objective,
not the tools. "Start with an end in mind, and find a way to measure it," says You Mon Tsang, founder and CMO of Biz360 in San Mateo, Calif.
"You
don't need to measure
everything just
because you can," says Kristin Zhivago, author of the book Rivers of Revenue: What to Do When
the Money Stops
Flowing. "You need to prioritize. To go from here to there in my car, I don't need to know
the temperature
of the windshield
washer fluid, but
oil pressure is
pretty important.
And the gas gauge
is even more critical."
In
other words, don't
implement a series
of random metrics
just because they
sound important. "Sometimes you end up measuring the activity and not the outcome," says Sergio Zyman, former CMO at Coca-Cola and author of The End of Marketing
as We Know It. "In the end, it doesn't matter how much you're spending to increase airline ticket
sales if those
dollars are aimed
at people who are
afraid to fly."
The
challenge at many
companies is getting
historically decentralized
marketing groups
to agree on a common
set of metrics.
That's where the
CMO comes in. "We all have limited financial resources," says GE's Sabol. "It's not fiscally efficient to expect separate IT support for each unit. Likewise,
it's better to
consolidate marketing
around one set
of metrics."
Tyco,
as it picks up
the pieces from
its scandal-plagued
past, has slowly
integrated pieces
of a marketing
function that once
had been fully
decentralized. "We used to have 50 different PR firms for Tyco," says Charlie Young, CMO at the Princeton, N.J., company. "There's simply no way that 50 firms can become engaged around a single topic
and not add their
own spin." The solution? "We consolidated and coordinated our efforts. We eliminated the wasted effort."
Starting
Point
The
key to finding
the right metrics—and
establishing accountability—is
to start with an
understanding of
the company's overall
objectives and
then link a set
of strategic goals
to them, says Gregory
Reid, CMO at Yellow
Roadway in Overland
Park, Kan. "To do that, you need to look at the current state of benchmarking that you already
have," he says. "Understand where you are and find the metrics that will be most important to
evaluate where
you're going."
Reid
began tracking
marketing's impact
on ROI when he
was with Procter & Gamble. "P&G taught me to think about marketing impact, predictability and ROI," he says. "I've taken those concepts to every organization that I've been with subsequently."
Marketing's
historic lack of
comprehensive measurement,
Reid says, fueled
perceptions that
the marketing group
was not important
in setting a company's
strategic direction.
But those perceptions
are beginning to
change. "It wasn't that you couldn't [measure marketing effectiveness] before," he says. "Technology certainly makes it easier now, but it's always been possible. What
we have now is
an appreciation
for the importance
of measuring the
impact of marketing
programs."
So
it should come
as no surprise,
Reid adds, that
companies showing
a commitment to
measuring marketing
tend to be better
at delivering profitable
revenue growth. "Financial measures are the primary way to track results," Reid says, "but in the end, the entire organization exists in order to profitably grow the
business and increase
the return to its
shareholders. So
it's important
that the CMO is
closely aligned
with the CEO and
the CFO when it
comes to marketing
strategy."
GE,
whose culture is
defined by measuring
quality using techniques
such as Six Sigma,
has extended those
activities to the
marketing function.
When Sabol measures
customer retention
rates, he demonstrates
in financial terms
the investment
necessary to acquire
a new customer.
To track customer
satisfaction, GE
performs weekly "Voice of Our Customer" surveys that ask a random sample of customers in specific product and industry
segments about
such issues as
pricing, value
and delivery.
GE
also uses metrics
around new product
introductions. "Every year, I target the amounts of revenue and gross profits we'll achieve," says Sabol. "If I achieve my goals, I ensure product line vitality and higher gross margins,
which in turn drives
higher ROI."
Sabol
admits that when
it comes to measuring
impact, marketing
faces some unique
challenges. "Alone, ROI cannot be used as an effective measurement tool for marketing because
the value of relationships,
attitude, brand
awareness and reputation
are difficult to
calculate in financial
terms," says Sabol. "It's not so easy to tie marketing to the income statement because we own only
portions of it.
But ultimately
we know that premier
marketing drives
premium returns."
Help
Me Help You
At
KeyBank, marketing's
traditional communications
role has morphed
into a far more
strategic position. "Operations knows that metrics will help us help them," says Haefling, who has spent much of her 25-year career working on ways to improve
marketing metrics. "Frankly, if you can't show some measure of worth—whether financial or value-added—you
shouldn't be doing
it."
KeyBank
focuses on various
metrics—acquisition
rates, conversion
rates, ROI—as they
relate to each
marketing initiative. "I can also measure the quantitative impact of performance activities," says Haefling. "Did the call get made in two days? Or did we have more success when a sales call
was preceded by
a mailing?" In the past, KeyBank had only high-level research surveys on satisfaction and
loyalty. "Now, with a rich client data warehouse and powerful campaign management tools,
we can pinpoint
the actual effects
of specific actions
for specific clients," she says.
Haefling
also looks to quantify
softer measures:
What was the customer's
reaction? What
was his or her
preference? How
does the bank compare
with its competitors? "I do that by taking surveys or looking at referrals," she says.
The
methods are not
new, but KeyBank's
use of them is,
Haefling claims. "When we know the perceptions of our clients and the underlying drivers of those
perceptions," she says, "we can use them to design new strategies that can be tested with a specific set
of clients to see
if their actual
purchase behavior
changes."
Haefling
presents the findings
to executives on
a quarterly basis,
but individual
initiatives are
reviewed much more
frequently with
the relevant business
unit. At budget
time, she relies
heavily on such
measures to make
a case for resources. "This is a journey," she says, "that requires good data, strong analytics, flexible tools and, most of all, a
mind-set to measure."
Tyco
also thinks in
terms of Six Sigma
tools to connect
marketing's goals
back to its business's
goals. "In the past, a lot of great work seemed soft—easy to question and, therefore,
easy to eliminate," says Young. "Marketing dollars got redirected because the measurement of them was not so rigorous.
"Our
goal now is to
make sure we have
solid metrics from
which we can pull
analytics," adds Young, "and we try to have a metric for everything that we do. It's a powerful way to
ensure a linear
effort."
Young
is a big fan of
of using Six Sigma
techniques to measure—and
improve—marketing
performance. "The methodology is agnostic to the area of discipline in which it is performed," he says. "It's as good for marketing as it is for manufacturing, and it can work for everything
if you adopt it
properly and condition
your team not to
be afraid of it.
"It
isn't possible
to dunk the whole
[marketing] function
in Six Sigma, but
we can establish
a set of strategic
goals for marketing
that are tied to
our CEO's goals," he says.
Such
techniques have
helped put marketing
on equal footing
with operations
and other departments
at Tyco. "Marketing metrics have helped us save millions of dollars at Tyco," he says. "We'll save in excess of $5 million in general printing costs alone just by taking
a more granular
look at our printer
relationships."
Those
are the types of
numbers that can
help turn the CFO
from adversary
to ally—a critical
step for the CMO. "The CMO and the CFO have been like oil and water in a lot of companies," says Yellow Roadway's Reid. "That's a huge mistake. Marketing is the one function that needs all others to
succeed. You need
to have a great
relationship with
everyone."
The
best way to do
that, many CMOs
agree, is to say
it with numbers.
"If
you want to be
an equal partner
in any business
endeavor, you need
to bring something
to the table," says Sabol. "You need to be able to measure—and validate—what you're doing."
More
CMOs understand
this; instead of
shying away from
the challenge,
they are embracing
it. "Strong marketers want to be measured," says Biz 360's Tsang. "They're not afraid, because they know marketing works."
Adds
Sabol, "We love this pressure, because we know that we generate an ROI as high—or higher—than
other functions
in the company.
So bring it on."
|